Advertisement
MP gets a clean bill on expenses
Date published: 13/10/2009
Rochdale MP Paul Rowen has today (Tuesday 13 October) been told that he does not have to pay back any of his expense claims.
Sir Thomas Legg KCB QC has sent letters to more than 500 of the 646 MPs in Parliament asking for more information or repayment on their Parliamentary ‘Additional Costs Allowance’ (ACA) claims.
The letters have caused controversy throughout Parliament and dozens of MPs including Prime Minister Gordon Brown have been asked to make substantial payments running into thousands.
Paul Rowen said: “This confirmation is no cause for celebration but indicative of my prudent approach to spending public money. I know that many MPs are not happy with any payments that they have to make but they should pay up so that we can move on deal with the huge problems facing the country at the moment.
"I have never hired a cleaner, I don’t have a gardener and have used any allowances claimed to have basic accommodation in London to enable me to do my job for the people of Rochdale.”
In a letter to Mr Rowen, Sir Thomas Legg QC, who carried out the inquiry, said: “In your case, having examined the records in the light of interpretation of the rules and standards in force at the time, I have not identified any payments made to you under the ACA during the review period which I consider call for any repayment or further supporting evidence to be provided by you. Accordingly, my conclusion is no action is required by you in this matter.”
Have Your Say
It might be alright for some independent person to say they are in the clear, yet that doesn't say the rules are now correct. It has been said all along it was the interpretation of the rules that caused the problem. Those in the clear still need to be watched. What is reasonable is one of the words open to interpretation.


Now we just need to find out which charities gained from the two years of councillors allowances and Mr Rowen will be in the clear
By Dalelad @ 13/10/2009 14:07:19
Report this comment (14288)