• Search

Charities fight music charges

Date published: 16 February 2010

Charity bosses are calling for a halt to plans to charge charities up to £20 million more a year to play music.

Senior figures from more than a dozen major UK charities, some of which run shops and services in the borough, have written to Lord Mandelson ahead of a change in the law later this month.

They want to see no change in an existing exemption for charities and not-for-profit organisations from payment of royalty fees to licensing firm PPL (Phonographic Performance Ltd).

Signed by the chief executives of Oxfam and Mind, and senior managers of Shelter, Age Concern and Help the Aged, British Heart Foundation and Alzheimer’s Society as well as a host of national charitable bodies, the letter states the new charge will put vital charity services at risk because organisations will have less money to spend on the people and communities who need it most.

The National Council for Voluntary Organisations (NCVO) has been running a “Don’t Stop the Music” campaign to prevent the decision, which was announced in November, becoming law this month.

Its chief executive, Stuart Etherington, said: “There are thousands of voluntary and community groups across the UK that already run on incredibly tight budgets and will rightly wonder how they will afford to pay this extra fee.

“Charities already have to pay a licence to PRS for Music if they want to play recorded music in their own premises, and this is a licence fee to a second royalties body, PPL — which costs a minimum of £80.”

It will apply to charities which hold discos, tea dances, drop-in sessions or youth clubs with music in the background, or have volunteers listening to the radio.

Comments

So why must we have music everywhere?

Performers and publishing companies derive their income from sale of performance. To the best of my knowledge the performers have not donated that income to the charities - and why should they. Note that pubs which do not play incessant, unwanted background music tend to do quite well!

Why should these charities not pay for playing Music. They have directors and helpers who draw wages from its funds. Do not forget charity starts at home. Most articles are given to them free, some helpers work for nothing. So they can pay directors wages.

 

Have Your Say

Post New Comment

 

To post a comment you must first Log in.  Don't have an account? Register Now!

 

 

Browsing with a mobile? Try our mobile website »