Planning refused for 16-bedroom HMO on Long Street

Photo: Google, DigitalGlobe

Planning to change 71-73 Long Street, Middleton to a House of Multiple Occupancy was refused

The Planning and Licensing Committee unanimously refused to grant planning for a 16-bedroom House of Multiple Occupancy (HMO) on Long Street on Tuesday (14 November).

The recommendation to refuse came from planning officers on the grounds of an unacceptable living environment due to ‘limited floorspace’, ‘cramped and substandard communal areas’ and ‘the proximity of shared bathroom facilities to bedroom and kitchen areas’. Planning officers also noted ‘insufficient provision’ was made for storing refuse and recycling containers.

Additionally, the proposal was ‘considered contrary’ to ‘Guidelines and Standards for Residential Development’ Policy of the adopted Rochdale Core Strategy and the National Planning Policy Framework.

Speaking on behalf of objectors, Martin Cove said: “HMOs have had their time. We do not need them – what we need is one-bedroom flats.

"Middleton Township said there would be no more HMOs in Middleton.

“The building is also up for sale with planning permission – I do not see how it is up for sale with planning when it has not been given yet.”

The property is currently listed for auction with a guide price of £300,000 as 'a great opportunity to buy a 16-bed unit HMO with a potential return of £114,400pa' with 'planning permission in process'.

Councillor Phil Burke confirmed Middleton Township did recommend no more HMOs in Middleton on the say so from strategic housing, following ‘issues’ with a similar property on nearby Mellalieu Street. However, the council’s solicitor said this ‘carried no weight’.

The committee also heard the application had been refused on a previous occasion.

Agent Frank Smith, speaking on behalf of the applicant, said: “There seems to be a stigma on HMOs and the type of person in the officer’s report, which I found disgusting. My client wants professional people there. It conforms to the standards so I am bemused why this failed to meet the standards.

“It will bring residents to the town centre, security, vibrancy and revenue.”

Councillor Allen Brett retorted: “I can not understand why professionals would want to live there. I move to reject this on planning. If the applicant is not happy, they can appeal the decision.”